On behalf of the unborn everywhere in the U.S., thanks, Mr. President.

I hope it sticks. But I fear it won't, since three years ago, a similar state ban here in Nebraska was overturned by the Supreme Court because it lacked a provision for "health of the mother." From what I understand, this U.S. ban has the same lack of clarity.

I'm neither a doctor nor a lawyer, but it seems to me that if the health of the mother is an issue and we're talking late-term pregnancies, wouldn't a C-section provide the mother the same relief (end of pregnancy) while giving the child a chance to survive?

--Sparki